OVERVIEW:
Tagore's novel depicts the struggle of a young wife, Bimala,
caught among conflicting interests and loyalties as she attempts,
on the advice of her husband, to better understand and take
part in the life of the world beyond the confines of her home.
In the process, she gets caught up in the politics of swadeshi,
an early 20th century independence movement in her native Bengal.
The novel's romantic-ironic structure challenges students to
evaluate the characters' actions in terms of conflicting public
and private, worldly and spiritual motives.
CORE QUESTIONS:
How might we identify with a young woman's emergence from
the shelter of a traditional marriage into a life of greater
public awareness and responsibility? How does her experience
remind us of our own? How similar to our own are the boundaries--geographic,
political, social--the characters in this novel live within,
stretch, and explore?
TIME REQUIRED: Three weeks.
SUGGESTED GRADE LEVELS: Grade 12.
INTERDISCIPLINARY CONNECTION: Social studies
NEW JERSEY CORE CONTENT STANDARDS: 3.1G 2, 4, 6;
H 4,5; 3.2 D 3, 6
OBJECTIVES:
1. Students will read Tagore's novel as a prompt for thinking
about and discussing questions of personal development, its
influence from culture and tradition, and conflicting allegiances
of family, marriage, friendship, and the political scene.
2. Students will learn about the political movement known
as swadeshi and its international interests as they read and
interpret Tagore's novel.
3. Students will trace out patterns of romance and irony
in this novel.
STRATEGIES:
Introduction:
The Home and the World (1915), Rabindranath
Tagore’s Bengali novel, tells the story of a young wife,
Bimala, caught between conflicting loyalties. She honors
her husband in the way of a traditional Hindu wife, but responds
with interest to the flirtatious advances made to her by her
husband’s old college friend, Sandip. She admires the women
who have devoted themselves to her husband’s family and accepted
its confining traditions in the past, but she gets involved
in a more public role when Sandip entangles her in political
activism. Past and present, public and private, domestic
and political, personal and social concerns tug at her from
different directions as she responds to a simple but unconventional
proposal made by her husband: that she should meet him as
his equal in the world and test their love there. Tagore
allows his three protagonists to narrate the story from their
distinct perspectives, each one revealing certain secrets
to us that have not been disclosed to the others and each
one giving a different slant on the actions they share in
common. Their love triangle bears an uncanny resemblance
to that of Lancelot, Guenivere, and Arthur from Thomas Malory’s
Morte d’Arthur, and other markers within the novel
ally it with the literary form called romance. The
political events depicted in the novel closely resemble events
of the swadeshi
movement in Bengal in the first decade of the 20th
century, in which the author was personally involved.
Interdisciplinary Inquiry Questions:
1. How
does the swadeshi movement depicted in this novel resemble
the political activism that went by that name in Bengal in
the first decade of the 20th century? Which character’s
actions most resemble the author’s personal involvement in
that political movement? How did swadeshi anticipate
the activism and struggle for independence led by Mohandas
K. Gandhi a few decades later? How does Sandip’s political
activism verge on terrorism as we would define it today?
How does Sandip’s lifestyle resemble the life of terrorists
we might read in the newspaper today?
2. This
novel’s romantic structure (its reprise of many elements of
romance) bears an interesting resemblance to the late
16th century English Morte d’Arthur, which
had its immediate sources in medieval French romances and
its more distant inspiration in legends of Celtic Britain.
How closely does The Home and the World resemble the
outlines of the Lancelot-Guenivere-Arthur love story told
in those older books? What special meanings come into the
story from its romantic structure? How important is romance
in modern Indian literature—and in modern Indian films? Indian
films show a marked preference for romance, and students might
make an interesting study of Indian films in this regard,
comparing to The Home and the World.
3. The
swadeshi movement depicted in The Home and the World
would have the Bengali people burn their English clothes,
spurn foreign goods, and depend more thoroughly on things
made in their own country by their own people. Bimala, in
accepting this movement, feels that she should no longer wear
the English dresses her husband has bought for her. Study
the history of English influence on dress in colonial and
modern India. To what extent is Indian fashion today distinct
and independent of foreign influence? To what extent has
the English influence on Indian dress continued and prevailed
in the present? Is there any blending today of Indian and
western fashion styles, in the United States or in India?
4. The
Home and the World gives many references to its characters’
educations, which are all derived to some extent from Indian
culture but also from English colonial influence. Thus, reading
this novel offers an opening to some research on education
and colonialism in India—a topic that could be extended with
other readings in literatures of post-colonial cultures from
Africa and elsewhere. What makes Bimala so conscious of her
husband’s education? What makes Nikhil so conscious of the
degrees and programs of study of the politically radicalized
students he speaks with in the novel? What values evinced
in Nikhil’s conduct might have come from his European education?
What values and interests in his and Sandip’s education and
reading might evince a European influence? What educational
structures, goals, programs, subjects of study, biases, prejudices,
and moral and civic values were bequeathed to Indian education
from the English?
Specific Questions Devolving from the Core Questions:
On Universalization:
1. How does Nikhil and Bimala’s household remind us of our
own? Would we say that our homes are more traditional than
theirs, or less so? Do our homes share any common traditions
with theirs? Do any rules, practices, customs, living arrangements,
family relationships, or gender roles in our own households
resemble theirs in some ways, even if they are not identical
with them?
2. Discuss Bimala’s identification with the other
women in her husband’s family. What is the basis for her
identification with them? Does she admire and respect them?
Does she empathize with them? Why or why not? Does she wish
to imitate patterns of feminine conduct in her husband’s family?
What opportunities does her culture allow her for getting
to know others and their ways of being in the world? How
would you compare hers with your own opportunities for getting
to know others and forming new identifications with people
in the world?
3. Consider Nikhil’s cosmopolitanism. In what ways does
he identify with values and patterns of living he has learned
from the wider world beyond his household and country? Would
you say his cosmopolitanism represents a good way of being
in the world?
4. Can you identify with Bimala’s unsettledness? Does her
position as a young adult challenged to enter the public world
and leave the confines of domestic privacy remind you in any
ways of your own position in the world?
On Geography:
5. What are the boundaries of Nikhil’s world? Describe his
estates and the purview of the zamindar’s realm as
depicted in this novel. How much does Nikhil seem to know
about the world beyond his estates and beyond his country?
How has he learned of these things? [Students might here
do some research to learn more about zamindars in Indian
society and history.]
6. Study the life of Panchu, the tenant farmer whose case
Nikhil takes up, and compare his limitations with Sandip’s
and Nikhil’s broader experience in the world. Can you tell
stories of people you know whose lives are as constricted
geographically as Panchu’s?
7. Sandip is described as a traveler. Where has he traveled?
How has his travel influenced him? How much does he know
of the world beyond Nikhil’s estates? How much travel have
you done? Has travel educated you?
8. How much has Bimala seen of the world beyond her husband’s
household and estates? Has her life been more restricted
than yours?
Crossing Cultural Boundaries:
9. What do you think of Nikhil’s proposition that Bimala
should meet him as an equal in the world beyond their home?
Does it seem fair and practical in their social context?
Do your family elders expect you to meet them as equals in
the world once you have achieved adulthood? What might restrain
Bimala or make it difficult for her to accept Nikhil’s proposition?
10. What are Nikhil’s criticisms of his social tradition?
What are Sandip’s? How do they express their common educational
background, in spite of their differences?
11. How would your feeling about life be different if you
lived as Bimala does in the first chapter of The Home and
the World?
12. Have you or your friends contemplated making changes
in your lives as thoroughgoing as the ones Bimala makes in
this story? What consequences would you incur if you changed
your relationship with your traditional past in ways similar
to the changes Bimala has made in her life?
13. Discuss Bimala’s sense of women’s roles in and contributions
to her husband’s family. Consider also her remarks at the
beginning about her mother. Does she want to continue in
their ways? Does she wish to emulate their examples? To
what extent is she willing to respect and emulate their examples
and to what extent is she willing to be modern and find a
new public role for herself as a woman?
Valuing Storytelling:
14. Why do these narrators want to tell their stories?
How does each narrator actually sound in telling his
or her story? Discuss the following motives for storytelling
and tell which ones you notice in the narrator of this book:
justification; self-aggrandizement; reflection; dramatization;
creating heroes. Do you see any other motives in their ways
of telling their stories?
15. Why has Tagore wanted to have three narrators? What
effect has he achieved in setting up their stories as three
versions of a common set of events? What seems particularly
modern about this?
16. What special values does the three-narrator structure
of this novel suggest to its readers? How do its narrators
value listening, being heard, and the opportunity for civil
argument? How might we translate these things into civic
practices in our lives today?
Individual Experience Reflecting Cultural Experience:
17. Which character in this novel represents traditional
Indian culture most piously?
18. How does each character in The Home and the World
represent Indian culture in a unique way?
19. How do the various characters of this novel manage foreign,
colonial influences in their lives? Is any character in the
novel without such influence?
20. How would you evaluate the foreign influences the characters
in this novel must respond to? Do some seem benign? Do some
seem pernicious? What advice would you give these characters
about dealing with such influences?
21. To what extent do you find your own life embodying cultural
influences that are foreign to those of your personal origins?
Would you make any comparisons between yourself and characters
in this novel, in this regard?
22. What has Rabindranath Tagore done to make this novel,
which owes much to the English tradition of the romance novel,
particularly Indian? What has Tagore borrowed from the European
novel and what has he put into this book that only an Indian
writer could imagine?
23. Has reading this novel made you more aware of an individual’s
responsibilities to diverse cultural influences and interests?
Does it make you see some good in combining diverse cultural
influences, or does it make you feel you should instead be
culturally pure and completely distinct in your culture?
24. Have you, in reading The Home and the World, found
yourself understanding actions in a character that you would
probably not take in your own life, if you found yourself
in a situation similar to that of this character? Have you
been surprised, in reading the book, to find yourself understanding
and agreeing with any action by a character that you would
have condemned in the past as an unworthy action? Has the
book broadened your range of empathy to any extent?
Reading Lessons:
Pre-reading Activities:
The teacher should prepare the class for reading a novel
with multiple narrators. Perhaps students will have had some
experience with such reading, or with viewing a film narrated
in this way. A classic example from the English tradition
is Mary Shelley’s novel Frankenstein. A recent successful
film with multiple narrative perspectives is the German work
Run, Lola, Run, which has been released internationally.
Of course, students’ experience with gossip provides a ready
model for such multiple-perspective storytelling. The teacher
might read a few brief passages from the novel to show, as
an introduction to its technique, how its three narrators
treat a single topic or event in their unique ways.
Also by way of introducing the novel, the teacher might give
some brief historical and biographical background on the early
20th century swadeshi movement in Bengal
and Rabindranath Tagore’s involvement in it. The novel’s
first readers were Bengali; it was written in their language
and depicted events they would have been recently acquainted
with. Tagore had less reason to include more political information
in the novel for them than a writer would have in approaching
this same topic in a new work today. This should be pointed
out to the students and should justify giving them some historical
introduction. Early Reading Activities:
The teacher should be sure students understand something
about romance as a literary genre. He or she might
introduce this topic by telling over briefly and in an engaging
way the outlines of the story of Lancelot, Guenivere, and
Arthur, from the English and European literary tradition.
This story might already be familiar to students from films
they have seen or from allusions made to it in other readings
they have done.
The teacher should also set out some markers for the genre
of romance: an adventurous tale, close psychological realism
about love and intimacy, devotion by the hero to high ideals,
chivalrous conduct by men towards women, distinct gender roles,
etc. Close reading of the novel’s opening passages will reveal
Nikhil’s and Bimala’s devotion to ideals (and Bimala’s uncertainty
about hers); similar close readings in the class of selected
passages from elsewhere in the text should turn up evidence
of these other markers, as well. The teacher can guide the
students in finding them at first and later ask them to find
others on their own.
To get used to the novel’s multiple-narration, students might
read selected passages aloud, finding, perhaps with the teacher’s
help, passages that retell a single event from each narrator’s
perspective. These might be read aloud in the class and dramatized.
Discussion should ensue. The teacher can ask students to
interpret attitudes, values, or moods that distinguish the
novel’s three narrators. The teacher should also make sure
now that students appreciate the deliberative and reflective
disposition all three narrators bring to their telling of
the tale, as if the novel were not a process of telling action
so much as one of introspection and self-discovery dramatized
for its readers.Mid-point Reading Activity:
Since The Home and the World’s three narrators share
a deliberative approach to the actions their story draws them
into, it would be well to analyze with students the rhetoric
of each character’s deliberation. A close reading will reveal
that each speaks with a habit of warranting, using cultural
commonplaces to justify his or her position on whatever
matter has prompted the latest expression of deliberation.
The teacher can explain this process of warranting and something
of its long tradition in law, in debate, in argument, and
even in conversation and everyday speech, in European culture
and civic life. Then, students can be asked to study selected
statements by the novel’s three narrators for their warrants
and especially for their uses of commonplaces as warrants.
For instance, when Sandip says, “Every man has a natural right
to possess and therefore greed is natural,” his egoism uses
“nature” as its warrant. When he says, “Theft becomes necessary
only because of miserliness, so its sin must be divided between
the miser and the thief,” he warrants his assertions by claiming
truth from commonplace belief about the badness of misers.
Once students have learned something of this kind of speech,
they can be asked to collect more examples from the book and
present them in class for analysis and discussion. Taking
this a step further, they might use the most general statements
of this kind from the novel’s three protagonists as speaking
points in debates to be held in class on such topics as ownership,
selfishness, flirtation, independence, social responsibility,
cultural pride, etc. Statements on these topics and the characters’
opposing arguments about them, which students can trace in
their reading, could prompt interesting debates in class,
with students coming up with contemporary examples to support
or oppose them. These “speaking points” might also—or rather—be
used as prompts for composition, asking students to write
their own views in response to some of the more compelling
or controversial statements made by Sandip, Bimala, and Nikhil.
As these activities are pursued, the teacher should make sure
students understand the role of debate in civic life in western
democracies and in many other countries as well.
An important question of critical reading should be broached
here: Does the author side more with one of these narrators
than another? Reading and learning about Tagore’s personal
character through his biography, available most comprehensively
in Rabindranath Tagore: The Myriad-minded Man (1995)
but also in many internet sites, encyclopedias, and other
reference books, students might come to see his resemblance
to Nikhil and thus suspect this character to be his alter-ego
and the novel’s hero. We might come to this conclusion for
another reason: Nikhil has the “last word” in the novel, so
to speak, culminating its action with a selfless heroic action.
The teacher should help students understand how the structure
of the novel and the game of literary interpretation allow
for and encourage such a determination.
Later Reading Activities:
Once students have advanced in their reading of the book,
the teacher can open up a discussion about heroism in its
story. Which of this novel’s three principal characters deserves
to be called its hero? Some debate should ensue on this question.
What claims might Nikhil and Sandip have on the title of “hero,”
if we compare them to the legendary heroes Arthur and Lancelot,
whom they resemble? Which of the two might seem more heroic
in an actual political situation? Who in contemporary society—here
and abroad—might prefer Nikhil, and who might prefer Sandip
as a heroic model? Which of these men treats Bimala more
heroically? How true today is the old chivalric claim of
honor to women as a form of heroism? How is each of these
men—Sandip and Nikhil—modern in his treatment of Bimala, and
is he deserving of the title hero for his new way of treating
and admiring this woman? What claim could Bimala make to
being the novel’s heroine? What does she do that is exalted,
generous, or of universal merit? Whom does she resemble among
heroines from other stories? Could we see the shakti,
or personification of a divinity’s power, in Hindu myth as
heroic? Could we call Bimala heroic for following Sandip’s
plan that she should be his shakti? Is she rather
more heroic in her troubled allegiance to her husband? Is
Nikhil really the hero, for his bold and selfless gesture
in the novel’s final scene? Could we say, from our reading
of Tagore’s biography, that Nikhil must be the author’s intended
hero, because he most closely resembles the political and
social ideals Tagore strove to embody in his life?
RESOURCES:
Rabindranath Tagore, The Home and the World. Trans.
Surendranath Tagore. London and New York: Penguin Books,
1985. [Original Bengali edition entitled ghare baire
published serially in 1915 and as a book in 1916.]
Dutta, Krishna and Andrew Robinson. Rabindranath Tagore:
the Myriad-minded Man. New York, St. Martin’s Press,
1995.
ASSESSMENT:
Any of the “core questions” given above sequence might be
used as prompts for essay writing or as open-ended questions
for written response and discussion, to be graded with rubrics
suited to the New Jersey Core Content Standards noted above.
They might be presented strictly as prompts for analysis of
ideas suggested in The Home and the World, incorporating
research on swadeshi, Indian domestic culture, the biography
of Rabindranath Tagore, etc. Or, they might be broadened to
allow students an opportunity to reflect in writing on their
own observations, experiences, questions, and expectations
about cultural and civic issues implied in the questions.
The “Interdisciplinary Inquiry Questions” given at the beginning
ould also become research papers written by students using
a variety of inquiry methods: library research, interview,
internet research, etc.
|